Skip to content

How does a good employer deal with work pressure?

Stéphanie van Rosmalen ·
Zorgmanager en verpleegkundige in gesprek over koffie in een lichte klinische pauzeruimte met natuurlijk daglicht.

A good employer addresses workload proactively and systematically — identifying problems early, tackling root causes, and offering employees concrete support. This means more than just responding to complaints; it means creating a culture where workload is openly discussed and addressed before it becomes a crisis. In this article, we answer the most frequently asked questions about workplace workload, from causes and warning signs to legal obligations and practical solutions — including the growing role of technology in sectors facing chronic staffing shortages, such as healthcare.

What are the most common causes of excessive workload?

Workload becomes a problem when the demands of a job consistently exceed what an employee can handle given the available time, resources, and energy. The most common causes include an excessive volume of work, lack of autonomy, unclear expectations, and insufficient support from managers.

In practice, the most frequently cited sources of excessive workload are:

  • Understaffing: too few people for the available work, leading to overwork and stress
  • Poor task distribution: some employees consistently carry more than others
  • Lack of control: employees have little say over their own work schedules
  • High emotional demands: particularly in healthcare, education, and social services
  • Administrative burden: excessive reporting and documentation requirements on top of core responsibilities
  • Unclear communication: conflicting priorities or vague job descriptions

It is important to distinguish between temporary busy periods and chronic workload pressure. Short-term peaks are a normal part of any job, but when the pressure persists without adequate recovery time, it creates real risks for employee health and absenteeism.

How can employers recognize excessive workload in their employees?

As an employer, you can recognize excessive workload through changes in behavior, increased absenteeism, declining quality of work, and signs of emotional exhaustion among employees. Early recognition is critical, because prolonged workload pressure leads to burnout and long-term sick leave.

Specific warning signs to watch for include:

  • Employees who consistently work overtime or skip breaks
  • Rising short-term absences or frequent sick calls on Mondays or Fridays
  • Reduced engagement, cynicism, or irritability
  • Mistakes that were not occurring before
  • Withdrawal or decreased collaboration
  • Explicit complaints about workload or lack of time

Beyond individual signals, it is also valuable to observe team dynamics. If an entire team goes quiet, shows less initiative, or collectively overworks, that is a sign the workload is affecting the organization as a whole. Regular check-ins, anonymous employee surveys, and open team meetings all help to catch these signals earlier.

What are an employer’s legal obligations regarding workload?

In the Netherlands, employers are legally required to manage workload as part of their occupational health and safety policy. The Working Conditions Act (Arbeidsomstandighedenwet) requires employers to identify, assess, and address psychosocial work-related stress — of which workload is a component.

In practical terms, every employer is required to:

  1. Conduct a Risk Inventory and Evaluation (RI&E), including an action plan for workload
  2. Appoint a prevention officer to advise on working conditions
  3. Provide employees with access to a confidential counselor for psychosocial concerns
  4. Periodically evaluate whether the measures taken are effective

The Dutch Labor Authority (Nederlandse Arbeidsinspectie) monitors compliance with these obligations. Violations can result in fines. Beyond formal requirements, employers also have a duty of care: you are responsible for providing a safe and healthy work environment, even in situations the law does not prescribe in detail.

What measures can an employer take to reduce workload?

Employers can reduce workload through a combination of organizational adjustments, improved communication, and targeted employee support. Effective measures address both the causes and the consequences of excessive workload.

Organizational measures

At the organizational level, this means distributing work fairly, reducing unnecessary administrative tasks, and ensuring adequate staffing. This may involve redesigning processes, delegating tasks, or making sustained investments in recruitment and training. In sectors facing staffing shortages — such as healthcare — creative solutions like task differentiation or technological support are sometimes also required.

Measures focused on employees

Alongside structural changes, it is equally important to support employees directly. Consider:

  • Regular one-on-one conversations about workload and well-being
  • Training in time management and stress management
  • Clear agreements about availability outside of working hours
  • Adequate recovery time, including sufficient breaks and vacation days that employees actually take
  • Recognition and appreciation for effort and contributions

The combination of structural and individual measures is the most effective approach. Focusing solely on the employee while leaving the work environment unchanged does not solve the problem.

How does a good employer differ from a poor employer when it comes to workload?

A good employer treats workload as an organizational issue and takes active responsibility. A poor employer places responsibility on the individual employee, only reacts when someone is already on sick leave, and views workload as a personal problem rather than a structural risk.

The difference lies in attitude, behavior, and policy:

  • Good employer: identifies problems early, actively checks in with employees, adjusts work processes, and invests in solutions
  • Poor employer: ignores warning signs, expects employees to manage their own limits, and only responds after damage has already been done
  • Good employer: creates a culture where workload can be discussed openly without fear of negative consequences
  • Poor employer: discourages complaints or treats them as a sign of weakness
  • Good employer: evaluates measures and adjusts policy based on feedback
  • Poor employer: takes one-off actions without any follow-through

Good employment practices around workload are also a matter of trust. Employees who know their employer takes them seriously are more resilient, more loyal, and far less likely to go on sick leave or look for another job.

When is technology a solution for chronic workload?

Technology is a meaningful solution to workload when the pressure stems from tasks that are routine, time-consuming, or physically demanding — and that can be automated or supported by a tool. In these cases, technology does not replace people; it takes over the work that keeps employees away from their core responsibilities.

In sectors with chronic staffing shortages, such as elderly care and hospitals, technology has become indispensable. Monitoring systems, for example, relieve care staff of the need for constant vigilance, freeing them to focus on direct care and human connection. These types of applications not only reduce workload but also improve the quality and safety of care.

Technology is a less suitable solution when workload stems from poor communication, a lack of leadership, or an unhealthy workplace culture. In those cases, no tool will fix anything unless the underlying problems are addressed first.

How Kepler Vision Technologies helps address workload in healthcare

In healthcare, workload is often a direct result of staffing shortages and the constant need to monitor clients and patients. At Kepler Vision Technologies, we develop AI-powered solutions that relieve care staff of the burden of continuous vigilance, so they can direct their time and energy where it truly matters.

Our software — Kepler Night Nurse and Kepler NurseAssist — offers healthcare organizations the following:

  • 24/7 automated monitoring of clients and patients, without requiring staff to be constantly present
  • Immediate fall detection with an alert within seconds, so emergencies never go unnoticed
  • Just one false alarm every 92 days, preventing unnecessary disruption and additional workload
  • Full privacy for clients, as footage is never viewed by human eyes
  • Plug-and-play installation, making implementation simple and fast

By taking over routine monitoring, our technology gives care staff back what they need most: time, peace of mind, and the space to deliver high-quality care. Want to find out how we can support your healthcare organization in reducing workload? Get in touch and discover what Kepler can do for you.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I start addressing workload as an employer when no policy exists yet?

Start with an honest baseline assessment: have conversations with team leaders and employees, analyze absenteeism data, and conduct a basic Risk Inventory and Evaluation (RIu0026E) if one does not yet exist. Appoint a prevention officer and make workload a standing agenda item in team meetings. You do not need to solve everything at once — consistency and genuine attention already make a significant difference compared to doing nothing.

What if employees are afraid to raise workload concerns for fear of how their manager will react?

This is a common problem and a sign that psychological safety within the team is insufficient. Provide anonymous channels — such as an employee satisfaction survey or access to a confidential counselor — so employees can share their experiences without risk. Managers can also lead by example by openly acknowledging when things are busy and sharing how they handle it.

How do I prevent workload measures from being a one-time effort that gradually fades away?

Embedding is the key: ensure that workload is a recurring topic in HR cycles, performance reviews, and team meetings, and tie measures to concrete goals and accountable owners. Evaluate at least twice a year whether the steps taken are actually having an effect, and adjust where needed. An action plan without follow-through is both legally insufficient and practically meaningless.

Is workload in healthcare fundamentally different from other sectors?

Yes, workload in healthcare has several unique characteristics: emotional demands are consistently high, mistakes have direct consequences for patient and client safety, and staffing shortages are deeply entrenched and difficult to resolve through recruitment alone. As a result, additional measures such as task differentiation and technological support are not a luxury in healthcare — they are a necessity to keep workload at a responsible level.

What is the difference between workload and work-related stress, and does that distinction matter for policy?

Workload refers to the objective volume of work and the demands a job places on an employee, while work-related stress is the subjective experience of someone who can no longer cope with that pressure. Not everyone experiences the same workload as equally stressful. For policy purposes, this distinction matters: addressing workload requires organizational measures, while managing work-related stress also calls for individual support and coaching. Effective policy targets both levels simultaneously.

Could technology such as AI monitoring actually create new workload or resistance among employees?

That risk exists if technology is introduced without involving employees in the implementation process. It is therefore essential to communicate transparently about what the technology does, what it does not do, and how it concretely reduces workload. When employees see that a system relieves them of repetitive or burdensome tasks — such as continuous overnight monitoring — and respects their privacy and professionalism, resistance typically fades quickly.

What are the most common mistakes employers make when addressing workload?

The most common mistake is treating workload as an individual problem, seeking solutions through employee training while leaving the work environment unchanged. Other frequent mistakes include intervening too late (only after someone goes on sick leave), implementing measures without consulting employees, and failing to follow up on signals from employee surveys. Chronic workload requires structural solutions at the organizational level, combined with genuine attention to the person behind the role.

Related Articles